Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(iii) Charge sheet states that the audio CD, transcript, caste certificate and other documents were taken from the complainant, as well as the PCR form and call register. Witnesses were examined.

Witness Vivek Singh verified his voice and the voice of appellant No. 1 and appellant No.2. The appellants also verified the voice in the audio CD. The other independent witnesses Vivek Singh, ` Ravikant Shukla and John Antony clearly stated that both appellants clearly abused the complainant on her caste and character in public view. The complainant stated that she belonged to SC/ST category and accused persons had prior knowledge about it.

(iv) Supplementary charge sheet stated that accused were called to give their consent for a voice sample but they refused. On 16th April, 2013, the complainant handed over a transcript or audio CD in 9 pages which was taken in possession. Witness Vivek Singh gave his consent to the voice sample. An audio cassette was deposited at FSL Rohini to match the voice of witness Vivek Singh. FSL report revealed that there was no indication of any form of alteration in the audio CD and the voice of witness Vivek Singh is the same as in the audio CD as well as in the cassette.