Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: procured document in Col. Rajinder Singh vs Taneja Developers & Infrastructure ... on 6 November, 2012Matching Fragments
It was further stated that the contention of the complainant that OP-1 had sent the model car to New Delhi in Truck on 3.7.2011, through OP-2, was false and the said bill of OP-2 was a procured document. It was further stated that the members of RXG Team had themselves taken the model car by truck to New Delhi on 2.7.2011 itself where the same was fumigated while loaded in the truck itself on 2.7.2011. It was further stated that OP-1 had no association with OP-2, as is clear from the Certificate of Incorporation and Extract of Memorandum of Association of Greentime Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. It was further stated that OP-1 only guided the members of Team RXG to get in touch with Mr. H.S. Kohli of Carex Cargo, New Delhi, who was dealing in the cargo of airlines. It was further stated that the amount of Rs.37,500/- and Rs.18,000/- deposited by the complainant in the account of Sh.Vijay Sethi, Director of Opposite Party No.1, was further transmitted to the account of Sh.H.S.Kohli as was clear from the account statement Ann.R-6 for further transmission to Jaya Express Cargo for spending on other formalities requisite for loading the model car in the cargo of Air Asia Airline. It was further stated that that the father of the complainant had deposited a total amount of Rs.55,500/- in the bank account of Opposite Party No-1 on 5.7.2011. As was apparent from the perusal of Ann.R-6, an amount of Rs.46,000/- was transmitted by OP-1 to the account of Sh.H.S.Kohli on 5.7.2011 and Rs.4700/- on 7.7.2011, which comes to Rs.50,700/-. The amount of Rs.4800/- was being with OP-1 qua which a demand draft (Ann.R-7), in favour of Gangandeep Singh Mahal, was prepared for delivery to him. It was further stated that the model car was handed over to the cargo representatives of the Airlines for loading on 5.7.2011, but due to some unavoidable circumstances, such as custom clearance at the 2nd level, permission of Carnet from Inspector, Superintendent, Assistant Commissioner & Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Inspection at Old Custom House and New Custom House in cases of Carnet Certificate wherein goods are sent abroad, which also have to come back to the Country unlike usual export goods, delay was caused, subsequently on account of the advice of the agents of Team RXG due to heavy rush, who were to receive the cargo from the Airline in Kuala Lumpur and to get the same released from the Custom Authorities in Malaysia, as informed by Jaideep Girdher from Malaysia, the said model car was withdrawn at the last movement from the Cargo Section of the Airlines. Thus the airways bill was cancelled. It was further stated that there was no deficiency in rendering service and indulgence into unfair trade practice on the part of Opposite Party No.1.