Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

13.          The core question that falls for consideration before us is that whether the Forum rightly passed the impugned order. The answer to this question is in the affirmative. It is the admitted fact that the complainant purchased House No.553 in The CSIO Employees Coop. House Building Society Ltd. on GPA. It is also the admitted fact that the complainant applied to the Opposite Parties for transfer of the aforesaid flat in his name but the same was not transferred due to non-payment of fee of Rs.23,500/-, which the Opposite Parties demanded vide letter dated 20.04.2011 alongwith notice publication charges and processing fee. Even Opposite Party No.5 in its written statement stated that the complainant approached the Court of Joint Registrar but the same was dismissed against him with a direction to deposit the aforesaid amount of Rs.23,500/- alongwith prescribed fee vide order dated 06.03.2013. It is pertinent to note that Opposite Party No.6 also stated in its written statement that without payment of aforesaid fee of Rs.23,500/- the share/flat could not be transferred in the name of the complainant. Even the appellant/complainant failed to convince this Commission that now the complaint is similar in nature. So, we are of the view that entire fault was on the part of the appellant/complainant, who failed to deposit the required fee of Rs.23,500/- especially when the said fee was paid by other Members of the society. We are also of the opinion that the Forum rightly held in para Nos. 9 to 11, which reads thus :-