Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

12. The first respondent has further filed additional affidavit contending that he has obtained police and hospital records against first petitioner through his friend which has been annexed to his affidavit.

13. The petitioners have responded to the said affidavit by filing further affidavit. In the additional affidavit, reliance is placed upon Rule l5.27 of the Family Law Rule 2004 for the purpose of contending that the use of documents produced pursuant to subponea is for the purpose of case only and the contents of the documents or copies thereof shall not be disclosed to any person without the Court permission. In the instant case, no such permission was obtained from the Court by the first respondent while producing documents alongwith affidavit. The contentions raised by the first respondent about procuring documents pertaining to police record and hospital record against the first petitioner is totally vague and deliberately the first respondent did not disclose the name of the so called friend. The first respondent has filed further affidavit denying the contentions raised in the affidavit made by the petitioners