Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: PERAMBALUR in A.L.Abul Kalam Azad vs A.L.Jawaharlal on 3 August, 2009Matching Fragments
(b) Civil Revision Petition No.4094 of 2010 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order dated 03.08.2009 passed in I.A.No.31 of 2007 in O.S.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur.
(c) Civil Revision Petition No.4747 of 2011 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order dated 03.08.2009 passed in I.A.No.21 of 2007 in O.S.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur.
(d) Civil Revision Petition No.4748 of 2011 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order dated 03.08.2009 passed in I.A.No.22 of 2007 in O.S.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur.
http://www.judis.nic.in
(e) Civil Revision Petition No.453 of 2017 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order dated 26.10.2016 passed in I.A.No.49 of 2016 in O.S.No.3 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur.
(f) Appeal Suit (First Appeal) No.553 of 2017 filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2017 passed in O.S.No.3 of 2011 on the file of the Mahila Court, Perambalur.
(g) Appeal Suit (First Appeal) No.993 of 2009 filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order and decretal order dated 03.08.2009 passed in I.A.No.21 of 2007 in O.S.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur.
3. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are herein referred to as appellant-A.L.Abul Kalam Azad and respondent-A.L.Jawaharlal.
4. O.S.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur, was filed by the respondent, as against his brother, i.e. the appellant and others, for partition in respect of the suit properties. The appellant also filed suit in O.S.No.18 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Perambalur, against the respondent and his wife, for partition of 90% share in respect of the suit properties wantonly and wilfully left out by the respondent- Jawarhalal in O.S.No.13 of 2005, contending that the suit property was purchased and he has contributed about 90% of the amount for purchase of the http://www.judis.nic.in same and its development. That apart, the appellant filed another suit in O.S.No.412 of 2005 for accounts against the father-in-law of the respondent, contending that the father-in-law of the respondent is in management of the suit property by letting out the same to the tenants and collecting rents.