Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
10.Further, the records reveals the fact that when the written statement was filed by the defendants 1 & 2 alleging that Ex.A2/Sale Agreement dated 01.07.2003 is fabricated document, it appears that the learned District Munsif has addressed letter to the District Registrar (Admin) calling for the details of the stamp paper, wherein, Ex.A2/Sale Agreement was came into force. As per the pleadings and the writing recitals in Ex.A2/Sale Agreement, the agreement said to have been entered on 01.07.2003. As per the communication under Ex.B5/copy of the Sales Register issued by the District Registrar Admin, Chidambaram, the Stamp Paper itself sold only on 01.12.2003 through the stamp vendor T.K.Kajamoideen, Parangipettai Village and it was purchased by the plaintiff viz., R.Rajaraman and it is clear that the agreement between the parties alleged to have been on 01.07.2003 could not have been possible and accordingly both the Courts below have held that Ex.A2/Sale https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Agreement is a fabricated document.