Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

d) Balance sheets including their schedules and annexures of all the family holdings pertaining to the year 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2007.
e) Any other document relevant and document necessary in power and possession of the Plaintiffs."

14. While allowing the above application, the concerned Joint Registrar, vide its order dated 01.10.2011, held that the relationship between the plaintiff and the shop tenants is a contested issue, especially in view of the allegations of backdated tenancy receipts intended to complete the sale agreement. It was further ruled that lifting the corporate veil is justified not only in cases of fraud, but also to fairly decide the case based on the discovery of relevant documents. The concerned Joint Registrar, therefore, allowed the application of the defendant for the discovery of those documents. Relevant extract of the order dated 01.10.2011 has been reproduced as under:-