Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

6. Appeals were admitted on the following substantial questions of law.

1) Has Lower Appellate Court erred in not finding that postal covers contained only proxy forms and not notice, as revealed from Exts.B7 series, opened as per the order in CMA RSA.418,538,584 & 592/11 119/2004.

2) Whether First Appellate Court was justified in granting a decree for injunction in favour of defendants 11 to 13, whose term would have ended, in view of Section 256 of the Companies Act, 1956, even if a valid meeting was convened on 2/4/2004.