Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: selection process completed in Warad Murti Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 June, 2020Matching Fragments
… … …
10. At this stage, it would be necessary to observe that a person who is directly appointed in order of merit in which they are recommended for appointment they have their inter se seniority, their seniority cannot be compared with any person who has been appointed in a subsequent selection process. The authority only has a right to fix the seniority of such probationer who could not complete his probation period successfully within his own cadre or within the person who had been selected in the same selection process. If the arguments of learned Advocate General is accepted, the same is likely to create an administrative anarchy because in a given case a person may complete the probation period successfully within one year and the other may not complete the same within two years and in between if another selection process takes place and the other person of the subsequent selection process completes the probation in less than one year and is confirmed then he is likely to become senior to the person who still had some Civil Appeal No. 2601 of 2020 @ SLP(Civil)No.14036 of 2019 etc. etc. Warad Murti Mishra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.