Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. Learned APP Mr. Pranav Trivedi referred to the police report dated 09.01.2021 to submit that false resolutions have been made by the Society and valuable land of the Society has been sold off by the applicants, who have misused their status in the Society. He pointed out R/CR.MA/22315/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 16/09/2021 that statements of Vrajesh Narayandas Parikh, Gitaben w/o. Yogeshkumar Shantilal and Seemaben w/o. Vandankumar Shantilal as also the members of the Society have been recorded, who have stated that land bearing Survey Nos. 44/5 + 6 + 7 + 35 paki, plot Nos.1 to 106 and Survey Nos.44/35 + 44/6 of account No.846, the roads and common plots admeasuring 24,281 square metres approx. (6 Acre), are of the ownership of the Society. It is also stated in the report that during the course of investigation, the applicants had moved this Court by way of Criminal Misc. Application No.22315 of 2017 and on examination of sale deed No.1886 of 2017 dated 29.04.2017, the police found inconsistencies in the documents produced by applicant No.1 when it was compared with the Registers maintained by the Society. It is also stated in the report that applicant No.1 along with co-accused had passed two Resolutions with false interpretations and had thereafter, sold the land in favour of the wife of applicant No.1 and other associates. The first of Resolution No.5.1 was passed on 04.09.2016, which relates to the sale of land and the public notice dated 30.06.2016 relates to development of land. By way of subsequent Resolution dated 26.01.2017, the land has been sold in favour of the wife of applicant No.1 and two other persons by way of sale deed dated 18.06.2016. As per the police report, both the above two resolutions are false and they have been passed by the applicants, which corroborate the say of the respondent-complainant. It was, therefore, prayed that the application may be rejected.