Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: impotency section 12 in Smt. Babita Bai vs Radheshyam Sharma on 28 June, 2016Matching Fragments
This Court does not find any irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the learned Trial Court inasmuch as order 14 Rule 5 vests power to amend and strike out issues, so also framing of additional issues for determining the matter in controversy between the parties. In the present case, the controversy between the parties is whether the non- applicant/wife is suffering from impotency making a ground under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act. For this, parties are required to adduce their own evidence including the medical evidence. The issue of limitation is not germane to the controversy.