Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Without entering into the disputed questions raised by the private respondents regarding the factum of marriage, it is held that life and liberty of petitioner Nos.1 & 2, requires to be protected by the State authorities. At present, petitioner No.1, has been brought in the Court by her father and brother. She being major, it was deemed appropriate to ask her about her wish in context to her constitutional right of liberty. She has expressed her desire to stay with petitioner No.2. An attempt was made to amicably settle the matter by persuading the private respondents especially respondent No.5, Makhan Singh, father of petitioner No.1, who is ... 3 Crl. Misc. No.25739 of 2009 in CRM No.M-9748 of 2009 working as a Preacher in village Bhadson. He submitted that petitioner No.1 has been misguided by petitioner No.2 and that petitioner No.2 is not legally married to petitioner No.1 and that he has been able to procure fake documents in order to defraud the Court.