Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3 ::: Uploaded on - 12/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 12/12/2025 23:07:34 :::

906-wp10593-2025 with wp16794-2025.doc

7. He submitted that reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Margret Almenda and others vs. Bombay Catholic Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and others, (2012) 5 SCC 642 was misplaced. He submitted that the said judgment dealt with jurisdiction. He submitted that the Cooperative Court, in paragraph 34 of its order, held that the dispute was hit by Sections 91, 92, and 163(3) of the MCS Act. He submitted that except Section 163, none of these provisions create a statutory bar. He submitted that Section 163 only bars civil suit. Hence, according to him, the impugned orders deserve to be quashed.