Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Docket explosion in Pt Bukaka Teknik Utama vs Commissioner Of Income Tax (It), Delhi - ... on 16 May, 2024Matching Fragments
(2012) 12 SCC 613.
8 Signature Not Verified(2020) 19 SCC 681.
Digitally Signed By:MAANAS JAJORIAW.P.(C) 4222/2021 18:40:47
14. The Supreme Court has also time and again lamented on the reasons for docket explosion. The Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. S.R.M.B. Dairy Farming (P) Ltd.9 expressed its concern on the reasons for pending litigation and made the following pertinent observations:-
"2. The propensity of Government Departments and public authorities to keep litigating through different tiers of judicial scrutiny is one of the reasons for docket explosion. The Income Tax Department of the Government of India is one of the major litigants. There are two departmental scrutiny at the level of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and thereafter an independent judicial scrutiny at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the „ITAT‟) level followed by the legal issue which can be inquired into by the High Courts. The last tier is, of course, the jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India before the Supreme Court.
3. Mindful of the phenomenon of the docket explosion and the rising litigation in the country, the Union of India in order to ensure the conduct of responsible litigation framed what is today known as the National Litigation Policy, to bring down the pendency of cases and get meaningful issues decided from the judicial forums rather than multiple tiers of scrutiny just for the sake of it. The Government, being a litigant in well over 50 per cent of the cases, has to take a lead in not being a compulsive litigant."