Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Considering rival contentions, perusing the material available on record, the points that arise for consideration are as follows:

1. Whether delay of approximately seven months in approaching the Court after publication of final selection list is a ground to reject the claim of these petitioners?
2. Whether the petitioners participated in the examination for selection of Secondary Grade Teachers i.e. TET-cum-TRT-2018 are estopped from raising any objection as to the mode of valuation after declaration/publication of final selection list, completing selection process?

In Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Surender Singh and Others (11th cited) appointment of Assistant Teachers (Primary) in school of appellant MCD was taken up. No cut-off marks were prescribed in advertisement, but in terms of Clause 25 of advertisement discretion was granted to Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board to fix minimum qualifying marks to achieve qualitative selection. The petitioners participating in the selection process challenged the said clause after completion of selection process. The Apex Court held that the principle of approbate and reprobate is applicable and candidates at this stage cannot complaint thereabout, besides, none of the petitioners had 30 MSM,J W.P.No.15355 of 2019 & secured more marks than last selected candidate and hence, there could be no further consideration in exercise of judicial review.