Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

16. It is submitted by the learned amicus curiae that pervasive corruption adversely affects welfare and other activities and expenditures of the state. Consequently, the rights of Indian citizens not only under Article 14 but also under Article 21 are violated. In this regard, he has relied upon the observations made by this Court in Vineet Narain1, Ram Singh[8], Subramanian Swamy[9], R.A. Mehta[10], Balakrishna Dattatrya Kumbhar[11] and In re. Special Courts Bill, 1978[12].

-----------------------

[1] Vineet Narain & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.; [(1998) 1 SCC 226] [2] I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu; [(2007) 2 SCC 1]. [3] Centre for Public Interest Litigation & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.; [(2012) 3 SCC 1].

[4] Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary & Ors.; [(2014) 2 SCC 532].

[5] Telecom Watchdog v. Union of India; (Delhi High Court W.P.(C) No. 9338/2009). 

[6]    State of Madras v. V.G. Row; [1952 SCR 597].
[7]    D.S. Nakara and Ors. v. Union of India; [(1983) 1 SCC 305].
[8]    State of M.P. and Ors. v. Ram Singh; [(2000) 5 SCC 88].
[9]    Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan Singh and Anr.; [(2012) 3 SCC 64].