Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. Shri Kalyan Saini has prayed for his appointment in terms of the order passed by this Court on 28.8.2002, in writ petition No. 19643/02 Jaikaran Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors.; in which his appointment out of the wait list on the ground that he was poor and experienced Mali, was set aside. He has prayed for a direction to adjust him in the next available vacancy.

4. Shri Murari Lal Pandey at Sl. No. 18 of the roaster has prayed in his writ petition No. 34640/2003, for his appointment on the ground that juniors to him including Smt. Vishnu Priya at Sl. No. 22 on the bottom of the roaster list have been appointed. He has alleged discrimination in the matter of appointments out of the select list dated 19.9.2000.

5. Shri Amit Trivedi placed at Sl. No. 16 in the roaster and appointed on 28.8.2001, and thereafter, ceased on 11.8.2004 on the ground that the select list had exhausted its life on 19.9.2001 has in the writ petition No. 45879 of 2004, challenged the order dated 11.8.2004 dispensing with his services on the ground that there was a clear vacancy and that persons below him in the roaster were appqinted.

6. The writ petition No. 46527/03 Jai Karan Singh has challenged the order dated 23.10.2002 passed by the District Judge, Mahoba, by which his temporary appointment was converted into adhoc appointment, on the ground that the conditions of his service could not be changed, contrary to service rules and in Violation of principles of natural justice.

8. The Senior Administrative Officer, Mahoba submitted a report on 6.11.2000 drawing attention of the District Judge, that 20% quota of women has not been provided in the appointments. The District Judge directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, a member of the Selection Committee to scrutinize the result sheet. On the same day after scrutiny of result sheet Smt. Vishnu Priya, a General category women candidate, was directed to be included in the list of General category candidate and one Shri Phool Singh was directed to be added in the list of S.C./S.T. category candidates. One more vacancy became available on promotion of one Raj Kumar, which was filled by appointing Shri Prem Narain from the list of Scheduled Caste candidate. Another vacancy occurred on 13.2.2001 on account of promotion of one Shri Hitesh Kumar, which was filled up by appointing Smt. Mamta Devi, a General category candidate in the list, purportedly placing her on roaster position No. 8, keeping in view the reservation for women.

9. In paragraph 13 of the Supplementary Counter Affidavit of Shri Balendu Singh it is stated that the total sanctioned strength of Class IV employee in the Judgeship of Mahoba on the date of advertisement was 31. In 2001 four more posts were created in the Judgeship of Mahoba for outlying Court in Tehsil Charkhari. In anticipation of these four posts, appointment letters were issued on 13.8.2001 to Shri Naseem Ahmad, Prakash Chandra, Sohan Lal and Rajendra Prasad, at Sl Nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12 in the select list, to be effective from the date they take charge at Charkhari. Shri Kalyan Saini was offered appointment on 27.8.2001, on the vacancy on account of voluntary retirement of one Binda Prasad, an Orderly. Shri Amit Kumar Trivedi at roaster point 16 was given appointment on 28.8.2001 on the post, which fell vacant on account of promotion of Amar Singh, the Orderly. Shri Kalyan Saini and Amit Kumar Trivedi were appointed ignoring the claim of Jai Karan Singh, Gauri Shankar Shukla and Shri Subhash Chandra Srivastava at roaster point 13, 14 and 15. Thus Shri Jai Karan Singh filed writ petition No. 19643 of 2002, which was allowed and while quashing the order of appointment of Shri Kalyan Saini challenged in the writ petition a direction was issued that the Jai Karan Singh the petitioner may be given appointment on the next vacancy, The order was passed in the absence of full facts as have been detailed in this writ petition. Accordingly, Shri Kalyan Saini was ceased to work.