Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Phone Tapping Case in Poonam Gadwal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 April, 2017Matching Fragments
The third judgment over which reliance has been placed was delivered by the apex Court in the case of People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) Vs. Union of India and another reported in (1997) 1 SCC 301. It was a case in which right to privacy has been dealt with and the major issue before the Hon'ble Supreme Court was of phone tapping. In the present case, the question of tapping phone of the Teachers does not arise. They are only being told to mark their attendance through Android Mobile Phone or they have to file and Affidavit and, therefore, it is not a case of phone tapping. The judgment delivered by the apex Court in the case of People's Union (supra) is again of no help to the petitioners.