Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Promissory note forgery in Asraf Ali vs Sp.Palaniappan on 23 July, 2015Matching Fragments
10. It is true that the application in I.A.No.896 of 2013 was filed only after commencement of trial. It is to be noted that there is no time limit prescribed for filing an application for Expert opinion. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent committed forgery by adding a figure to make it appear as if promissory note was issued for a sum of Rs.3,10,000/-. The petitioner has got his own reasons for raising such apprehension. It is true that the petitioner has not taken up any such contention expressly in his reply notice. However, there is an indication in his reply notice and written statement to the effect that he has signed blank promissory notes.