Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

20.An I.A.No.143 of 2011 was filed on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Trichy (Wakf Tribunal) claiming the relief of temporary injunction restraining the Writ Petitioner and others from illegally dealing with the Wakf property, which ultimately came to be dismissed on 30.09.2011. As against the order dated 30.09.2011 in I.A.No.143 of 2011 in W.O.P.No.5 of 2011, one Syed Kasim and others filed C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.646 of 2012 before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. On 18.12.2012, the Madurai Bench of this Court held that the representation given by the Revision Petitioners before the Wakf Board in regard to the claim of the Writ Petitioner as Muthavalli and his conduct in dealing with the property will have to be enquired into by the Wakf Board. Also, this Court directed the Tribunal to enquire into the complaint as regards the alienation of Wakf Property. Finally, the Civil Revision Petition came to be disposed of on 18.12.2012. Indeed, this Court granted liberty to the Wakf Board to pass suitable orders on the basis of complaints before the Board. Inasmuch as the order is against the Writ Petitioner, he deliberately suppressed the said order and stated that the Civil Revision Petition is pending.

31.Finally, it has granted liberty to the Revision Petitioners to satisfy the Wakf Tribunal about the locus standi of the Revision Petitioners and also about the attempt on the part of the 1st Respondent to alienate the wakf properties etc.

32.In view of the disposal of C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.646 of 2012 by the Madurai Bench of this Court on 18.12.2012, the averment made by the Writ Petitioner in the affidavit in the Writ Petition that the C.R.P.No.646 of 2012 is pending, is contrary to fact, reality and opposed to conscience, in the considered opinion of this Court.