Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned A.G.A. on the prayer for bail pending appeal and suspension of sentence also. Perused the impugned judgment and order.

The accused-appellants Pankaj Kumar Tewari and Rakesh Kumar Tewari have been convicted in Sessions Trial No.82 of 2002 (Case Crime No.383/2001) for the offence punishable under Section 323/34 I.P.C. and have been sentenced to undergo one year's simple imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo two months' simple imprisonment and have have been acquitted to the charge for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 324 I.P.C. Accused-appellants were on bail during trial and presently they are on interim bail. That there is nothing on record to show that they ever misused the liberty of bail.

The accused-appellants Hasmat Ullah, Ikbal Kha and Ishhak Kha have been convicted in Sessions Trial No.529 of 2005 (Case Crime No.C-35/2004) for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 323/34, 504, 506(2) I.P.C., Police Station Pihani, District Hardoi. The maximum sentence awarded to them under Section 452 is three years' rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.500/- on each of them and in default of payment of fine to further undergo one year's additional imprisonment and all the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. Accused-appellants were on bail during trial and presently they are on interim bail. That there is nothing on record to show that they ever misused the liberty of bail.

The accused-appellants Israj and Kalloo have been convicted in Sessions Trial No.884 of 1997 (Case Crime No.63 of 1994) for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and under Section 3(1) (X) of SC & ST Act, Police Station Kasimpur, District Hardoi. The maximum sentence awarded to them under Section 3(1) (x) of SC & ST Act is two years' simple imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.500/- on each of them and in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month's additional simple imprisonment and all the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. Accused-appellants were on bail during trial and presently they are on interim bail. That there is nothing on record to show that they ever misused the liberty of bail.

The accused-appellants Karta Ram and Vinod have been convicted in Sessions Trial No.29 of 2002 (Case Crime No.C-25/2001) for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and under Section 3(1) (X) of SC & ST Act, Police Station Khargupur, District Gonda. The maximum sentence awarded to them under Section 323 I.P.C. is one year' simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/- on each of them and in default of payment of fine to further undergo two months' additional simple imprisonment and all the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. Accused-appellants were on bail during trial and presently they are on interim bail. That there is nothing on record to show that they ever misused the liberty of bail.