Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

He further submitted that the ownership of the Hope Bridge is of the State Government and the State Government has to take the ultimate decision. He submitted that even SVNIT was requested recently to inspect the Bridge and report as regards the feasibility of retaining the same. The SVNIT in no uncertain terms has opined that it is advisable to dismantle it for safety of persons and safety of adjoining Nehru Bridge. At this stage, learned counsel for the Corporation also invited our attention to a further affidavit filed on behalf of the Corporation, wherein the Incharge Executive Engineer has stated thus:
I submit that the Surat Municipal Corporation got prepared the draft heritage policy of Central Urban Development Corporation, Delhi, in September 2009 and at that time the suggestion from the Gujarat Urban Development Corporation was also called for. In the said report it was also mentioned that the Hope Bridge is required to be dismantled and demolished.
I submit that the survey is already made by SVNIT and also by STUP Consultant earlier. I submit that the Central Water Power Resources, Pune, has also opined that the Hope Bridge is damaging foundation on Nehru Bridge and, therefore, the Hope Bridge is required to be demolished. I submit that inspite of Sardar Patel, Swami Vivekanand Bridge there is heavy load of traffic on Nehru Bridge and, therefore, new bridge is required to be constructed just by the side of Nehru Bridge and the foundation of Hope Bridge and Nehru Bridge are not similar and there is efflux, where there is a flood there is difference in level of water in respect of both the bridges. I submit that inspite of request made by the Corporation, the Hope Bridge is not being considered as heritage property by the State Government. I submit that even SVNIT was also requested recently to report for condition and assessment of Hope Bridge, and the report was given by the said Institution on 10th October 2011 which was advised that it is advisable to dismantled the bridge for the safety of person and for safety of Nehru Bridge.
I submit that in view of the fact that there are reports from the STUP Consultant as well as SVNIT, after the survey being made by the Professor of SVNIT, which is well-known Engineering Institute, there is no further progress. On the contrary, the Corporation has asked the State Government to give two spans for placing the same somewhere as heritage property, but, the bridge as such will have to be dismantled in view of what is stated earlier in the affidavit-in-reply and in this affidavit also."
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Looking to above all point the present Hope Bridge which has undergone severe corrosion of some of load bearing components, requires large scale repairs. And in its present condition, if it cannot be used for vehicular traffic, it is advisable to dismantle it for safety of persons and safety of adjoining Nehru Bridge.
 


 


 


		Thanking you,
 


 


 


		(Dr.A.K.Desai)				(Prof.S.N.Desai)
 


Associate
Professor, Applied Mechanics Head, Applied Mechanics Deptt, SVNIT, Surat Deptt, SVNIT, Surat (M) 93274 33390 (M) 98247 87178"