Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

3. It is urged, firstly, that the succession certificate granted to Musimmit Govindi having been withdrawn, she is no longer entitled to a decree against Saheb Ram. In our opinion, Section 4 of the Sub-section certificate Act does not apply to the fact of the present case. That section say that, No Court shall pass a decree against a debtor of a deceased person for payment of his debt to a parson Jai entitled to the effects of the decree 1 parson or any part thereof or proofed upon an application of person claim into be so entitled, to exacta against such a debtor a decree or order for the payment of his debt except on the production by the parson so claiming of a scansion certificate, effaces," In the present case Muhammad Gavin is saint a debtor of the effect of had husband but a parson who has call that estate an! is chilling khan as against her. This application of the dab's way made bag after than death. of Her Prasad. That Sahib Ram's hands is dual to that hair of Har Parsed bat Sahib Ram in case can be said to have been a debtor that estate of Har Prasad. Section 4 of that Certificate Act was alary adopted to protest a debtor when ailed upon at pay a debt dues by him to a dataset parson. Har Marian, than original mortgager, if he may at paid off than debt, wale hive bang a debtor such as is contemplated under sailor 4, Sahib Rim, in than airaamitvniss of than peasant case, is an shah debtor and in oar opinion Moslem Gained had an nasality whatsoever to pariah a suasion artifacts is this litisrvtioa, Tea daisies of this Characin that miter of the suasion certificate any relating to Brij Narain's ale an adoption, in an way final or bindings barware that parties. Section 25 of the All air vary oar indeed on this plaint.