Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

33. The learned A.P.P. has relied upon the entries contained in document found in Crime No. 15/01 that petitioner A. A. Nayeem had earlier also paid Rs. 11.90 lacs to the Naxalities. In this respect, the learned Senior Counsel has stated before us that the petitioner is not an accused in the said case and the proceedings therein have been closed. He had also placed reliance on the Judgment in L. K. Advani v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 1997 Cri.L.J. 2559 and Central Bureau of Investigation v. V. C. Shukla and Ors., in support of his contention that the entry on loose sheet is not admissible in evidence and that such statement or entries shall not alone be sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability. In both these cases, charge sheet had already been filed. In relation to the evidence relating to receipt, it is urged that the receipt is in respect of the business transaction. In this connection, it is pertinent to note the following facts.