Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAJSAMAND in Aasita Bhatiya vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022Matching Fragments
3. The bone of contention in the present case was that the land was acquired under the National Highway Authority Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1956') for a highway project in the Rajsamand District of the State, and thus, the publication of the notification in the official gazette on 31.05.2013 under Section 3A of the Act of 1956 to determine the compensation under Section 3G of the Act of 1956 for acquiring the land admeasuring 108.5076 hectare in the Rajasamand District, would entitle the non-applicant/writ petitioner for compensation under the Act of 2013 or the unamended Act of 1956.