Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

57. He further deposes that he has also valued the land Sy.No.133/P10 measuring 03.02 guntas of Bennikodi village as per Ex.P.83 and valued at Rs.5,07,800/-. He has valued the land Sy.No.31/1P measuring 05 acres situated at Muktenahalli village and issued the report as per Ex.P.131 and valued at Rs.4,85,000/-.

58. In the cross-examination of learned counsel for the accused No.1, he has admitted that the Davanagere was under CMC Limit during the year 2005-06. The lands surrounding the Davanagere has been escalated. He has adopted the value as per the Sub-Registrar, but he has not enclosed the documents along with the valuation report. He further admits that he himself went to there and no other engineer were accompanied him. He has not referred the valuation report submitted by the accused persons. He further admits that there is a difference in value of the Government as well as forced value and market value. He further admits that in the forced value a person sell the property under the circumstances and market value is existing surrounding the area. The comparative value means the value adjoining with the adjoining properties. He further admits that he has not mentioned all the 03 values.