Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6. The above view of ours, is also supported by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court dated 31.1.2005 in the case of Salam Khan v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and Ors. 2005-1-L.W.676....

19. In Syed Moinudeen v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board reported in 1998 I L.W. 134, a Division Bench of this Court while dealing with Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure held as follows:

The first and foremost requirement under unamended Sec. 92, is that the sanction from the Advocate General must have been obtained. As rightly pointed out by learned senior counsel for the appellants, the purpose of the sanction from the Advocate General is to prevent frivolous suits being filed in respect of the trusts relating to religious or charitable objects. Whatever may be the purpose, the Judgments cited above clearly indicate that unless the requirements of Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure are strictly followed, the suit cannot be deemed to be the suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Whatever be the nature of relief and even accepting the stand of the counsel for respondent, no decree can be deemed to be a decree under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless the requirements of Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure ha been followed.