Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Similarly, this bench is at a loss to comprehend the return of the notice of hearing of a quasi-judicial body constituted under the RTI Act by an establishment under the Govt. of India on the said ground- "All Receiver refused wanting proper addressee here RTS".
It is inferred from the facts on record that either there is no clarity amongst the employees of the Respondent office about the role and functions of their own establishment and their functionaries, besides Namita S Pandey, CPIO, CIT, Appeal Unit-2, Lucknow and Shishir Jha, Pr. CCIT, UP (East) Region, Lucknow appear to have created a sheer mockery of the RTI Act with their appalling contradictory stance about who is the FAA in the matter.