Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

I am afraid the aforementioned argument is not sustainable for the simple reason that Bhopal Singh, alleged encroacher, was not impleaded as a party. In view of the stand of defendant No.3, in the written statement, the appellant should have approached the competent authority for execution of the ejectment decree under Section 7(2) of the 1961 Act. The simpliciter suit for permanent injunction without mandatory injunction is not maintainable.

Keeping in view the aforementioned facts, I do not find any illegality and perversity in the judgments and decrees, much less, no substantial question of law arises for determination. No ground is made out for interference. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed.