Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 379 ipc in A.Ganesh Raghu vs The State Of Telangana on 29 March, 2019Matching Fragments
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that it is alleged that the detenue was indulging in theft of gold ornaments from women folk travelling in Road Transport Corporation buses and sharing autos including by diverting attention in the limits of Sangareddy District thereby creating large-scale fear and panic among the people adversely affecting the maintenance of public order. Hence, she is a "Goonda" as defined under the Act. It is further alleged that since 2015, she was involved in as many as ten cases that were registered against her under Chapter-XVII of IPC, namely in i) Cr. No. 182/2015 under Section 379 IPC of Bibinagar Police Station of 2 RSC,J & TA,J Wp_2156_2019 Rachakonda Police Commissionerate; ii) Cr. No. 570 of 2016 under Section 379 IPC; iii) Cr. No. 606 of 2016, under Section 379 IPC; iv) Cr. No. 51 of 2017, under Section 379 IPC of Kukatpally Police Station of Cyberabad Police Commissionerate; v) Cr. No. 304 of 2017, under Section 379 IPC; vi) Cr. No. 414 of 2017, under Section 379 IPC; vii) Cr. No. 170 of 2018, under Section 379 IPC of Patancheru Police Station; viii) Cr. No. 50 of 2018, under Section 379 and 420 IPC of Koheer Police Station; ix) Cr. No. 43 of 2018, under Section 379 IPC; and x) Cr. No. 46 of 2018, under Section 379 IPC of Hathnoora Police Station of Sangareddy District.