Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Even otherwise, the accused herein is charged for the offences under Sections 420, 408, 423 and 426 IPC alleging that the accused being the paid director of Narne Estate Private Limited has committed criminal breach of trust and cheating while acting as paid direction of Narne Estate Private Limited. Now the documents which the prosecution intends to rely upon as clearly averred in the petition i.e. documents No.1 to 7 have no nexus at all to the crime in question and they are immaterial and irrelevant for consideration and the prosecution even failed to explain as to how the said documents in question are material for establishing the alleged offences. When once the fact that the accused herein was a paid director in Narne Estate Private Limited was not at all disputed (or) denied by the accused which is clearly evident from the evidence on record i.e. of P.W.1 as the accused did not choose to cross-examine OP.W.1 who is said to be de facto complainant in this case. Therefore, mere mentioning in the petition that P.W.2 has whispered in his evidence about the documents that are referred in the petition itself is not ground t receive said immaterial and irrelevant documents which serve no purpose in deciding the main case. As already stated above the prosecution utterly failed to explain as to how the documents are material and relevant in bringing home the guilt of the accused person when once the status of the accused as the paid director in Narne State Private Limited is an admitted fact and the establishment and existence of Narne Estate Private Limited is not in dispute. Therefore, it appears that the petition is intended only to drag on the matter on some ground (or) other without any purpose."