Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

*****
170. In view of the discussion above, we arrive at the following conclusions:
170.2. Conduct of the non-signatory parties could be an indicator of their consent to be bound by the arbitration agreement;"

[Emphasis Supplied]

12. Dr. Tulzapurkar would point out that the Learned Arbitral Tribunal was presented by OCS Services with a purported agreement between OCS Services and Planet Support to indicate that there was an independent contract governing the terms on which Planet Support was involved and purportedly only provided assistance to OCS Services. This document was specifically assailed by Hind Offshore as being a "patently fabricated and backdated document styled as a services agreement " in an Additional Affidavit dated October 24, 2025. However, the Impugned Order states in Paragraph 43 that it is not "the case of the Applicant that the service agreement is a sham agreement or a surrogate agreement", and therefore, the Impugned Order is based on a blatantly wrong reading of the record.