Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

9. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the result should be published in category wise, providing the cut-off marks for different categories of candidates who would appear in the Physical Efficiency Test. It has been submitted that the selection has to be made on the basis of the marks obtained in the mains examination as the persons who have cleared the mains examination have only to pass the Physical Efficiency Test and the persons have to be selected as per the merit list of mains examination prepared by the Commission. It has further been submitted that while publishing the result the Commission has applied the principle rendered in the case of Union of India vs. Ramesh Ram and Others reported in 2010(7) S.C.C. 234 is a misplaced application, it can only be applied at the stage of final selection. Further submitted that the entire selection process is completely opaque, bereft of transparency and as such, it violates the fairness and led to arbitrary exercise of power, violating the Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

(2) The Commission may hold a Combined Competitive Examination for posts with similar eligibility criterion.
10. Transfer of pending selection process relates to cadre posts of Group C- Selection process shall be completed by the "Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Services Commission" for the appointment to all such cadre posts as mentioned in the appended schedule of this Act, in respect of which the advertisement has not been issued or published by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission or Bihar Technical Staff Selection Commission or any other Commission or Board;

Provided that the selection process shall be completed by such other respective commission or Board for appointment to all such cadre posts as mentioned in the appended schedule of this Act in respect of which the advertisement has been issued or published by any other Commission or Board till the date of commencement of this Act."

32. Learned counsel for the Commission has further placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Angesh Kumar (supra) which relates to Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2010, under the R.T.I. the petitioners were not provided the information of cut-off marks for every subject, model answers and complete result of all candidates. In that context, the Hon'ble Supreme Court says that if it will be given it will completely delayed the process of selection and confidentiality would be compromised. In paragraph no.9 it has held that the information sought with respect to Civil Services Examination cannot be directed to be provided mechanically.