Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

2. It was on 30.06.2015, a First Information Report [FIR] was lodged by one Mainul Hoque as the informant before the Officer In-Charge, Bheloguri Police Station stating inter-alia that at around 09-30 p.m. on 29.06.2015, the father of the informant, Giyas Uddin, aged about 70 years, was sitting inside his house. At that time, the accused-appellant, who was informant's brother, killed his own father, Giyas Uddin by stabbing him on his back, chest and hands with a dagger.

              Ext.-4        General Diary Entry dated 29.06.2015
              Ext.-5        Ejahar
              Ext.-6        Inquest Report
              Ext.-7        Sketch Map
              Ext.-8        Charge-Sheet
              Material Exhibit
              Mat. Ext.-1   A Dagger

14. In his evidence-in-chief, P.W.1 deposed to the effect that the occurrence took place at around 09-00/10-00 p.m. on a day during the last Ramzan month.

P.W.1 stated that at that time, he was in his own house, which was across the road in front of the house where the appellant and the deceased used to be inmates. Having heard disturbance from the house of the appellant and the deceased, P.W.1 went there and his other brothers also assembled there. He found the door of the house closed from inside. Then by forcibly opening the door, they went inside the house and going inside the house, they saw that their father was lying on the ground in an injured condition and the appellant was standing there holding a dagger in his hands. Then, they caught hold of the appellant and tied him with a rope to keep him detained there. P.W.1 stated that after a shortwhile, their father who sustained injuries on his person, died. Information was given to Police and Police personnel arrived at the P.O. after an hour. The Police personnel seized the dagger in their presence and he gave his thumb impression in the Seizure List. P.W.1 further stated that he had seen the dagger, which was seized by the Police, in the Court during his testimony. P.W.1 further stated that he filed the FIR.

16. P.W.3, in examination-in-chief, deposed that the incident took place at around 09-00/10-00 p.m. He further stated that on the date of the incident, the appellant and the deceased were staying in the same house. When he heard noise coming from the house of his elder brother, that is, the deceased, he went there and saw that the appellant was kept tied with a rope there. The people assembled there told him that the appellant murdered his father. P.W.3 stated that he saw the deadbody of the deceased lying on the ground with injury marks on chest. P.W.2 further stated that there he saw a dagger, which, later on, was seized by the Police. P.W.3 further stated that he gave his thumb impression in the Seizure List.

19. P.W.7, in her examination-in-chief, deposed to the effect that the incident took place at around 09-00/10-00 p.m. around eight-nine months earlier. At that time, she was sleeping in her house. P.W.7 stated that the appellant and the deceased stayed in a separate house. Hearing cries of her father-in-law, that is, the deceased, she woke up and went to the house where the appellant and the deceased used to reside. Going there, she found her father- in-law lying on the ground in a pool of blood and the appellant standing inside the room holding a dagger in his hands.