Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: cmc ltd in The Union Of India And Others vs Maroti Devidas Kalyankar And Others on 4 May, 2018Matching Fragments
26. It is necessary to point out here that, the recruitment process in Gujarat was quite different from the recruitment process in 48 RA6.2018&Ors Maharashtra. The said process was initiated in 2014 and Outsourcing Agent was CMC Ltd. The examinations were held in June-2014 and the results were declared. In the present case, the outsourcing agent is different, the posts were different and the dates of examination were different. The learned Judges of the Gujarat High Court in their judgment in para 3.5 and 3.6 observed that, no vigilance angle was found to have been established in fair conduct of PA SA examination in 11 circles including State of Maharashtra. This observation is factually not correct. The judgment was delivered on 16.08.2016 and even before that in Maharashtra the vigilance enquiry was directed. Complaints were received. The Apex Court has relied upon the above observations of the Gujarat High Court.