Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

27. The defendants 1 and 2 in their written statement in para's 5 and 7 replied as follows:

“5. It is utter false to allege that the late Samsudeen Rawther, had only one https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis legally wedded wife namely Mohamed Pathu and through her he had one son Mohamed Madhar and Two daughters Ismail Pathu, the Plaintiff and one Jaithun Beevi. And it is false to allege that Samsudeen Rawther during his life time, he was conducting Bombay shows a dance program in the area and during that period he was keeping one Mangala Devi, a Hindu Women and a dancer by profession as concubine. And it is further false to allege that this second and third defendants were born to him through Mangala Devi and there was no legal marriage between Mangala Devi and Samsudeen Rawther and it is false to allege that Mangala Devi being a Hindu, lived as a Hindu and died as a Hindu without any form of marriage with Samsudeen Rawther. The plaintiff has vehemently and falsely stated for the purpose of this case by hiding all the real facts of the legal marriage between the late Samsudeen Rawther and his Second wife Fathuma Beevi and also this second defendant and the third defendant are the legal and legitimate children born to the late Samsudeen Rawther and his second wife Fathuma Beevi. The plaintiff has to strictly prove the allegations alleged in para no. 5 of the plaint totally.