Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: backdated agreements in Peer Gulam Jilani S/O Peer Gulam Sarvar ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 August, 2019Matching Fragments
9. I have considered the submissions.
10. There is specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR that he has prepared an agreement to sale to grab the property belonging to wakf. Chunna Mali had expired in the year 1952 and one of his sons would not have executed the agreement to sale. It appears that 2.5 bighas of land was purposely valued at Rs.95 to create an agreement on a backdate. As for valuation, above Rs.100/- property cannot be transferred except by a registered document, his son has also denied having executed an agreement in favour of the petitioner.