Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

35. The inclusion of the mark PREMJI by Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as well as unknown persons/Defendant No. 20 on their fake website, fake application and WhatsApp groups; prima facie appears to be identical or deceptively similar to the registered trademarks. The unauthorized use of the names and pictures of the senior management of the Plaintiffs in these groups and circulation of fake documents in the name of the Plaintiffs in these groups substantiates the pleas of fraud alleged in the plaint. On the basis of the documents brought on record, it is evident that if Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as well as unknown persons/Defendant No. 20 are not restrained from infringing the Plaintiffs registered trademarks, the said Defendants will continue to confuse and mislead the general public to believe that said Defendants are associated with the Plaintiff. As a result, these malafide and dishonest acts of Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as well as unknown persons/Defendant No. 20 would cause potential damage to the reputation and goodwill of the Plaintiffs.

38. Accordingly, till the next date of hearing, the following directions are issued: -

38.1. Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 20 (and other similar websites/domains/entities which are discovered during the proceedings), their employees, agents, representatives, assignees, and all persons acting for or on their behalf, are restrained from infringing the Plaintiffs' registered trademarks and copyrighted content in any manner whatsoever, including by reproducing the Plaintiffs' marks/logo/website content in any Fake Website, Fake Domain Name, Fake App, or otherwise.
38.2. Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 20 (and other similar websites/domains/entities which are discovered during the proceedings), their employees, agents, representatives, assignees, and all persons acting for or on their behalf, are restrained from passing off, or facilitating the passing off, of their services or products as those of the Plaintiffs, whether by use of any Fake Website, Fake Domain Name, the 'Premji Invest' trademark or Premji Invest Logo, or otherwise in any form.

39. In the facts of this case, the Plaintiffs have also prayed for a dynamic injunction against the fake websites/applications, as soon as they are created. The Plaintiffs state that it is the general public which is being duped of its money by the use of these fake websites/applications. It is contended that loss of each day in seeking take down or locking of the website and applications, will cost the general public. Learned counsel for the Plaintiffs states that Plaintiffs have received 70 complaints from general public prior to filing of the present suit and 10 complaints after the filing of the present suit. He states that there may be many more victims, who have not approached the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs have drawn this Court's attention to the FIR and the complaints filed with the regulator. Given these facts, this Court is satisfied in the facts of this case, dynamic injunction ought to be issued to protect the Plaintiff's registered trademarks and the unsuspecting members of the public from the fraudulent acts of Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as well as unknown persons i.e., Defendant No. 20.