Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

9. In the appeal, following grounds have been raised.

o The impugned judgment of conviction passed by the Trial Court is contrary to law and facts of the case.

           o The Trail      Court has not properly appreicated
              the     evidence   before   it    and     has     thus

erroneousely convicted the appellants/accused for the alleged offences.

o The Trial court has totally ignored the fact that there is enormous delay in lodging the complaint, the complainant has not explained the reason for the delay and that being so the very genesis of the complaint is doubtful. And thus the Trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants.

o The Trial Court ought to have taken into account that, the victim girl is aged more than 17 years as on the date of alleged incident and also that the evidence before the Court are full of contradictions and omissions of the prosecution and hence the entire case is created and concocted one. And thus the Trial Court has wrongly convicted the appellants. o The Trial Court has filed to appreciate the fact that the allegations in so far as accused No.2 is a Omni bus allegation and there are contradiction in the evidence of PW-8 and PW- 9 which effects to credibility of the prosecution case. And thus the Trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants. And thus the Trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants. o The Trial Court has wrongly convicted the appellants basing on the evidence of PW-1, 3 and 4 but on the contrary the evidence of all the witnesses are not trust worthy, and more so they do not speak about the overact of accused No.2 except saying he was instigating accused No.1. and thus the Trial Court has wrongly convicted the appellants.