Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Promissory note forgery in State Of Haryana vs Shiv Singh And Ors. on 22 February, 1992Matching Fragments
Secondly, that you all on the aforesaid date and place, in your aforesaid capacity of the aforesaid society in discharge of your duties, fraudulently forged promissory notes in respect of the amounts allegedly disbursed and used those Tamasaka (Promissory Notes) as genuine documents which you then knew or had reasons to believe the same to be forged one and that you thereby committed an offence under Section 471, TPC and within my cognizance."
6. No doubt the accused were not charge-sheeted under Section 467, IPC, but the second charge framed against them does speak about fraudulently forging of promissory notes and the forgery regarding Promissory Note is provided under the provisions of Section 467, IPC, which provides imprisonment which may extend to 10 years, whereas Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code does not itself provide for any punishment.