Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: missing while pension in Har Swaroop Shrivastav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 March, 2017Matching Fragments
It is further submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the service book of the applicant is missing from the office as a result of which his pension has also not been fixed. It is further submitted that in fact the respondent No.2 has access to the service book of the applicant which is evident from the fact that he has filed a photocopy of the mark-sheet of the applicant before this Court in writ petition to demonstrate that his date of birth is 19.01.1954. The counsel for the applicant further relied on a judgment passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Mahendra Dixit v. State of M.P. & Anr., reported in 2015 (3) MPLC 21 (MP) and submitted that when the question of correctness of the date of birth was decided by the department itself then the police should not have registered the FIR.