Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

25. Citing the above judgment, the learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that the petitioner, as a socially conscious person, always stands in the forefront to fight such issues for the common good of all and in fact on an earlier occasion, challenging the move of the very same Panchayat for construction of a shopping complex in one of the village tanks, she has filed a writ petition in W.P.No.35942 of 2006 before this Court and since the same was dismissed by this Court by the order dated 18.1.2006, she approached the Honourable Supreme Court in S.L.P.(C)No.4502 of 2006, which was later on converted as Civil Appeal No.3418 of 2006 and the Honourable Apex Court in its reported judgment, in the above matter, in SUSETHA vs. STATE OF T.N. [(2006) 6 SCC 543], though has held that 'the doctrine of sustainable development although is not an empty slogan, it is required to be implemented taking a pragmatic view and not on ipse dixit of the court', has ultimately dismissed the said appeal of the petitioner.