Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(ii) that there was no complaint filed by deceased Rajkumar or Shashikant Kushwaha for theft of the mobile phone by the accused and the mobile phone was never seized during investigation from the accused;
(iii) that intimation was first received from TIMA Hospital and only thereafter the police station received information about the crime; that station diary entry was made about receipt of intimation from TIMA Hospital in respect of injury to Rajkumar and Geetadevi; but he did not remember at what time the entry was made in the station diary regarding receipt of the letters from TIMA Hospital; that he has not produced the station diary in evidence along with the charge sheet; that Exhibits '28' and '29' state the time of receiving the letters by the police at 3.05 a.m. and endorsement of station diary entry No. 4; that the letter at Exhibit '30' was received at 9.00 a.m. on 06.11.2015 and is entered at entry No. 13; that he was unable to comment about the change in time of death of Rajkumar from 2.25 a.m. to 3.25 a.m.;

(xiii) that on 06.11.2015 he visited the hospital between 9.00 and 9.30 a.m. to record the statement of Geetadevi and the statement was recorded by police Naik Shubhangi Naukudkar between 9.30 and 9.40 a.m.; however in this respect also there is no entry in the station diary; that there is no mention / entry in the station diary about instructing police Naik Naukudkar to visit the hospital and record the statement of Geetadevi and return to the police station; that the time of leaving and returning to the police station of these personnel to carry out investigation is not recorded in the station diary; he admitted that there is no entry in the station diary that on 06.11.2015, he along with the investigation team went outside the police station for investigation of the same crime; that the station diary ought to bear the names of the members of the investigation team, which were not mentioned;

(ii) both PW-4 and PW-5 have admitted that since the office door was bolted from the outside, they did not witness the incident or see the accused;

(iii) the station diary entry No. 3 at 1:05 states that the police station received a phone call from Paradyes Chemical Company that one 'Guddu Singh' had thrown acid on two persons who were being taken to TIMA Hospital for treatment; thus the station diary entry No.3 at 1:05 a.m. could then have been made only on the basis of information given by PW-4 and PW-5, as according to the IO, the name of the accused was never informed by the deceased till they reached the hospital and recorded their statement;

53 of 77 conf 4-19.doc

(iv) the IO has admitted that there are no entries in the station diary regarding police Naik Shubhangi Naukudkar having left the police station to investigate and record the dying declaration of Geetadevi; nor are there any station diary entries regarding search investigation carried out by the IO himself;