Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Customer data in M/S Malhotra Rubbers Ltd. vs . State Of Delhi & Ors. on 4 June, 2016Matching Fragments
5. It is stated by CW2 Sh. Akashdeep, employee/ Manager IT in the complainant company that he is working with the complainant company since Feb'2013 and he is responsible for the IT Department of the complainant company. It is stated that accused no.2 and 3 joined the company on 01.08.2014. It is stated that upon joining he personally handed over the laptop connected to server and provided department related data like customer data, pricing, knowhow of the technology to accused persons. It is stated that the accused persons are the residents of Mumbai and the company provided expense of reallocation of the accused persons i.e. their renting, transporting etc. It is stated that company provided them proper training to work with the company. Before joining the company both the accused persons were working with GRL Tyres. It is stated that after getting all the data from the complainant company, both accused persons left the company without any information. Later they informed HR Department through their personal e-mail. It is stated by him that once he saw that both the accused persons in connivance with each other were taking out some print outs (around 40-45 pages) from the company data. It is stated by him that both the accused persons had joined the complainant company for 25 days only in order to steal secret information of the company. There was an agreement that they cannot leave the office of the complainant company before 3 years, in this manner they breached the agreement. He adopted the documents Ex.CW1/A to CW1/D as being the official documents maintained by the complainant company. He also adopted the documents Mark B to L. It is stated that the company also made a complaint to SHO, PS Moti Nagar to register a case against accused persons but police did not register any complaint.
11. In the present case complainant has examined 2 witnesses. The first witness CW1 Sh. Abhishek Bhandari simply stated that the accused persons were earlier working in a competitor company of the complainant. He also deposed about the expenditure incurred by the complainant company on relocation of the accused persons. He stated nothing about any criminal act being committed by the accused persons.
12. The second witness CW2 Sh. Akashdeep stated that he handed over a laptop connected to server and provided department related data like customer data, pricing, knowhow of the technology to the accused persons. It is also stated by him that once he saw that both accused persons in connivance with each other were taking out some print outs around 40-45 pages from the company data. It is stated by him that both the accused persons had joined the complainant company for 25 days only in order to steal secret information of the company. There was an agreement that they cannot leave the office of the complainant company before 3 years.