Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

This application has been filed seeking to grant leave to the applicants/plaintiffs to file suit under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short, "the CPC").

2. The case of the applicants herein is that they are full members of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), Madras, the first respondent/first defendant-Association. It is an unregistered body started in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ in C.S.Diary.No.36935 of 2021 the year 1844 in London Town by 12 young men to help the youth who migrate to town by providing decent accommodation at affordable rates. It also in the process helped the youth to grow in moral and spiritual life so that they are not attracted to the vices of the city life. The movement became popular world-wide. It was started in India in the city of Calcutta and then in Chennai, almost hundred years ago.

12. He referred to communication dated 10.11.2020 of Kingsley Consultants, Architects and Engineers, addressed to the General Secretary and CEO of YMCA, Madras, in which it is shown response from 7 tenderers https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ in C.S.Diary.No.36935 of 2021 to the proposed construction of commercial building at their Royapuram property. One of the 7 tenderers named in the communication was one M/s.Amazee Infra Structures, a proprietary concern owned by none other than the second plaintiff's wife. In the said communication, the decision of the consultants not to accept the tenders of the above concern, as it was found to be invalid, was conveyed. As the tender bid by the second plaintiff's wife, was rejected, he joined hands with two others to file the present suit, and therefore, the suit is clearly intended to advance vested and personal interests of the individuals. The second plaintiff who has an axe to grind against the first respondent/first defendant, cannot claim to represent any public interest at all.