Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

"14. We have taken note of the various relied upon judgments which have held that deciding equivalence is not the subject matter of the Courts. However, in the instant case, the fact remains that the equivalence was thoroughly examined by the respondents themselves and an equivalence was established by recommending that those applicants possessing MCA/M.Sc. (Computer Science) should be given appointment to the post of TGT (Computer Science). The respondents have not only taken this conscious decision but also directed the respondent No.3 to take necessary action. Certain file notings indicate that as concluded in the report by the then Director (Education) and approved by the Special Director of Education, the respondent No.3 - DSSSB was advised to consider MCA and M.Sc. (Computer Science) as the qualification equivalent to Graduation with „A‟ level diploma. Subsequent to the submission of the report by Direction (Education), specifically 28 Item No.21/C-I OA No.708/2019 stating that the candidates possessing the qualification of MCA/M.Sc. (Computer Science) should be given appointment to the post of TGT (Computer Science), the respondents vide letter dated 16.05.2018 have directed respondent No.3 - DSSSB that the candidates possessing the qualification of MCA/M.Sc. (Computer Science) should be appointed to the post of TGT (Computer Science)..."
"18. In view of the above mentioned, we are of the view that the decision taken by the respondents on the basis of the report of the then Director (Education) establishing equivalence and the subsequent advice given to the Chairman, DSSSB vide letter dated 16.05.2018 do not suffer from any 34 Item No.21/C-I OA No.708/2019 infirmity and illegality. On the basis of this, the applicants who have already been issued the offers of appointment in this selection for the post of TGT (Computer Science) vide Post Code No.192/14, shall be considered for appointment to the post of TGT (Computer Science)."