Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
"I have gone through assessee's submission and AO's findings.
Ground no 1 is general in nature and is not being adjudicated.
As regards Ground of appeal no. 2, it is seen that the G.P. shown was 1%
as against 1.05% in the immediately preceding year. On a turnover of
more than 109 crores, this marginal decrease in my opinion is
insignificant and could be due to various business factors which also
cannot give constant G.P. year after year. When the department does
not give any extra credit to a business for achieving a higher G.P. then it
should also not be concerned with a minor decrease in the same
especially when, as in this case, the A.O. has no specific defects
highlighted in the books but has generalized his argument on the basis of
absence of stock register quality wise & certain expenses not being
supported by proper vouchers & been paid in cash.
The assessee is a foodgrain dealer & in such a trade it is neither practical
nor possible to maintain quality wise details as has been held by me in
several cases of this nature earlier.