Matching Fragments
3] It is a settled principle of law that those persons who did not
challenge the wrongful action in their cases and acquiesced into the
same and woke up after a long delay only because of the reason that
their counterparts who had approached the court earlier in time
succeeded in their efforts, then such persons cannot claim the benefit
of the judgement rendered in the case of similarly situated persons to
be extended to them. They would be treated as fence-sitters and
laches and delays, and/or the acquiescence, would be a valid ground
to dismiss their claim.
3] It is a settled principle of law that those persons who did
not challenge the wrongful action in their cases and
acquiesced into the same and woke up after a long delay
only because of the reason that their counterparts who had
approached the court earlier in time succeeded in their
efforts, then such persons cannot claim the benefit of the
judgement rendered in the case of similarly situated
persons to be extended to them. They would be treated as
fence-sitters and laches and delays, and/or the
acquiescence, would be a valid ground to dismiss their
claim.
In view of the foregoing reasons, the refund proposal of
M/s Carbon Resources Pvt. Ltd., Bongaigaon, for the year
2013-14 in respect of Rs. 1,37,87,928/-, under the Assam
Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is hereby rejected.
Year : 2014-2015
Writ Petition [C] no. 415/2023
Order no. Grounds of Rejection
CTS-853/2019/113 1] It is a settled principle of law that those persons who
did not challenge the wrongful action in their cases and
acquiesced into the same and woke up after a long delay
only because of the reason that their counterparts who had
approached the court earlier in time succeeded in their
efforts, then such persons cannot claim the benefit of the
judgement rendered in the case of similarly situated
persons to be extended to them. They would be treated as
fence-sitters and laches and delays, and/or the
acquiescence, would be a valid ground to dismiss their
claim.
In view of the foregoing reasons, the refund proposal of
M/s Carbon Resources Pvt. Ltd., Bongaigaon, for the year
2014-15 in respect of Rs. 23,45,905/-, under the Assam
Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is hereby rejected.
Year : 2015-2016
Writ Petition [C] no. 413/2023
Order no. Grounds of Rejection
CTS-854/2019/115 1] It is a settled principle of law that those persons who
did not challenge the wrongful action in their cases and
acquiesced into the same and woke up after a long delay
only because of the reason that their counterparts who had
approached the court earlier in time succeeded in their
efforts, then such persons cannot claim the benefit of the
judgement rendered in the case of similarly situated
persons to be extended to them. They would be treated as
fence-sitters and laches and delays, and/or the
acquiescence, would be a valid ground to dismiss their
claim.
