Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6) Learned APP appearing for the respondent State has submitted that this Court may pass appropriate order.

7) Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and upon perusal of the material placed on record, it appears that respondent No. 2 has filed a complaint before Adalaj Police Station for offences under Sections 3(1)(10) of the Atrocities Act and Sections 504 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The allegations in the complaint suggest that, in connection with a disputed property, the accused erected a fence on 22.06.2008 and thereby blocked the access to a common plot. This led to a quarrel, and the complaint was lodged thereafter. After investigation, chargesheet was filed on 13.07.2009, and charges were framed against the accused under Section 3(1)(10) of the Atrocities Act and Sections 504 and 506(2) of the IPC. Witnesses were examined NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/692/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/04/2026 undefined in Special (Atrocity) Case No. 20/2009 on 23.07.2009. Subsequently, on 11.08.2009, the complainant filed an application for further investigation, stating that during the investigation, the provisions under Sections 3(1)(4) and 3(1)(5) of the Atrocities Act had not been investigated and no charges had been framed under these sections. As a result, application was made for further investigation. The learned Sessions Court allowed the application on 13.10.2009, after taking cognizance of the case and commencing the recording of evidence. Upon perusing the records and the information provided under the RTI Act at Exh. R1, it is evident that the investigating officer - Deputy Superintendent of Police, has thoroughly investigated the case. No offence under Sections 3(1)(4) and 3(1)(5) of the Atrocities Act was found to have been committed. Furthermore, in relation to the disputed property, a civil suit is ongoing, and a chapter case being No. 188/2008, was registered qua breach of public tranquility.