Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
On the other hand, counsel for the respondent contended that the written statement has to be read as a whole and it would depict that the defendant has repeatedly and strongly denied the averments of the plaintiff regarding challenge to the release deed and has defended the release deed to be legal and valid and there was only inadvertent typographical error in paragraph 2(vii) of the written statement which is sought to be corrected by amendment of written statement and the same has, therefore, been rightly allowed by the trial court.
"2(vii) That para no. 2(vii) of the plaint is wrong hence denied. It is stated here that the fact of execution of the release deed was kept concealed from the plaintiff and the plaintiff came to know only in the last week of December, 2005 regarding the execution of the release deed. It is stated here that the plaintiff is an educated lady and she is shrewd and cunning and was very much aware about the execution of the impugned release deed since 22.02.2002. The defendant has every right to alienate the suit land in favour of any person in any manner."
Paragraphs 2(iv), (v) and (vi) of the original written statement are also reproduced hereinunder:-
"2(iv) That para No. 2(iv) of the plaint is wrong hence denied. The plaintiff is a well educated lady and was major at the time of execution of the release deed dated 22.02.2002. No fraud or undue influence was practiced over the plaintiff in the execution and registration of the release deed.
(v) That para No. 2(v) of the plaint is wrong hence denied. The plaintiff out of her own free will relinquished all her rights, title and interest in the suit land in favour of the defendant vide release deed dated 22.02.2002 regarding the suit land.
(vi) That para no. 2(vi) of the plaint is wrong hence denied. It was the plaintiff who out of her own free will duly executed the release deed dated 22.02.2002 in favour of the defendant in the presence of the attesting witnesses and the same was got registered by Sub Registrar Bahadurgarh as per provisions of law. There was no need of the mother of the plaintiff in the execution of the release deed when the plaintiff herself is an educated lady. It is wrong to say that the rate of the agriculture land in village Badli has gone many fold high and due to this reason the plaintiff has turned dishonest."